Sales Article of the UCC
Overview
The Sales Article of the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code Article 2) governs the sale of goods — tangible, movable personal property. It does not apply to the sale of services, real estate, or intangible assets. When a transaction involves a mix of goods and services, courts typically apply the predominant-purpose test to determine whether Article 2 governs.
:::info Goods vs. Services
If Kingfisher Industries hires a contractor to install a custom HVAC system, the contract may involve both goods (the HVAC unit) and services (installation labor). If the primary purpose is acquiring the goods, the UCC applies. If the primary purpose is the service, common law governs.
:::
Merchants vs. Non-Merchants
The UCC imposes higher standards on merchants — parties who deal in goods of the kind involved in the transaction or who hold themselves out as having special knowledge or skill in the goods.
| Merchant | Non-Merchant | |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Deals in goods of the kind OR has specialized knowledge | Casual or occasional seller |
| Good faith standard | Honesty in fact and observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing | Honesty in fact |
| Firm offer rule | Applies (signed written offer stays open) | Does not apply |
| Battle of the forms | Additional terms may become part of the contract between merchants | Additional terms are treated as proposals only |
| Confirmation rule | Written confirmation enforceable between merchants within the Statute of Frauds | Not applicable |
Bear Co., a commercial office furniture dealer, is a merchant when selling desks and chairs. However, if Bear Co. sells its old company van, it is likely not a merchant for that transaction because it does not regularly deal in vehicles.
Good Faith Obligation
Every contract under the UCC imposes an obligation of good faith in performance and enforcement. For merchants, this means not only honesty in fact, but also observance of reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in the trade.
Contract Formation Under the Sales Article
The UCC relaxes many of the strict formation requirements of common law to facilitate commercial transactions.
Open Terms
Under the UCC, a contract for the sale of goods can be formed even if some terms are left open, as long as the parties intended to make a contract and there is a reasonably certain basis for giving a remedy. Critically:
- Price can be left open — the court will supply a "reasonable price at the time for delivery."
- Quantity is the one term that generally must be specified (except in output and requirements contracts).
- Time of delivery, place of delivery, and payment terms can all be filled in by UCC gap-fillers.
Merchant's Firm Offer
Under common law, an offer can be revoked at any time before acceptance unless supported by consideration (an option contract). The UCC changes this for merchants:
A merchant's firm offer is irrevocable without consideration if:
- The offer is made by a merchant.
- The offer is in a signed writing.
- The writing gives assurance that the offer will be held open.
The maximum irrevocability period is 3 months. If the offer states it will be held open longer, it is only firm for 3 months — after that, it becomes a revocable offer.
If Gies Co. (a merchant) sends Bear Co. a signed letter stating, "We will hold this offer open for 6 months," the offer is firm for only 3 months. After that, Gies Co. can revoke at any time before Bear Co. accepts. No consideration is needed for the first 3 months.
Acceptance — No Mirror Image Rule
Under common law, an acceptance must be the mirror image of the offer — any deviation is treated as a counteroffer. The UCC rejects this approach.
Under UCC § 2-207 (the "Battle of the Forms"):
- A definite and seasonable expression of acceptance operates as an acceptance even if it contains additional or different terms.
- Between merchants, additional terms become part of the contract unless:
- The offer expressly limits acceptance to its own terms.
- The additional terms materially alter the contract.
- The offeror objects within a reasonable time.
- If one or both parties are non-merchants, additional terms are merely proposals that do not become part of the contract unless expressly agreed to.
:::note Example
MAS Inc. offers to sell 500 units of inventory to Illini Entertainment at $20 per unit. Illini Entertainment responds: "We accept, and we require that all disputes be resolved by arbitration." The arbitration clause is an additional term. If both parties are merchants, the arbitration clause becomes part of the contract unless it materially alters the deal or MAS Inc. timely objects.
:::
Shipment as Acceptance
Unless the offer clearly requires acceptance by a specific method, the UCC allows acceptance by:
- Promising to ship the goods, or
- Promptly shipping the goods (including nonconforming goods).
If the seller ships nonconforming goods, this constitutes both an acceptance and a breach — unless the seller notifies the buyer that the shipment is offered only as an accommodation. In that case, the shipment is a counteroffer, not an acceptance.
Auction Rules
- In an auction with reserve (the default), the auctioneer may withdraw the goods at any time before the hammer falls.
- In an auction without reserve, the goods cannot be withdrawn once bidding begins.
- Each bid is an offer; the fall of the hammer is the acceptance.
- A bidder may retract a bid before the hammer falls.
Modification Without Consideration
Under the UCC, an agreement to modify an existing contract for the sale of goods does not require new consideration — a significant departure from common law. The modification must, however, be made in good faith.
If BIF Partners agrees to buy 1,000 widgets from Kingfisher Industries at $10 each, and the parties later agree to increase the price to $12 due to a raw materials shortage, the modification is enforceable under the UCC without additional consideration — as long as it was made in good faith and not under duress.
Defenses Under the Sales Article
Fraud
A contract for the sale of goods may be voided if it was induced by fraud — an intentional misrepresentation of a material fact, made with knowledge of its falsity, with intent to deceive, and upon which the other party justifiably relied to their detriment. Fraud makes the contract voidable at the option of the defrauded party.
Statute of Limitations
The UCC provides a 4-year statute of limitations for breach of a sales contract. The clock starts when the breach occurs (typically at the time of delivery), not when the breach is discovered. The parties may reduce the period to no less than 1 year by agreement, but may not extend it beyond 4 years.
Statute of Frauds
A contract for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more must be evidenced by a writing sufficient to indicate a contract, signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. The writing must specify the quantity of goods.
SWAP Exceptions — A contract within the Statute of Frauds is enforceable even without a writing if:
| Exception | Rule |
|---|---|
| S — Specially manufactured goods | Goods made to the buyer's specifications, not suitable for sale to others, and the seller has substantially begun manufacturing |
| W — Written confirmation between merchants | A written confirmation sent between merchants that is sufficient against the sender, and the recipient does not object in writing within 10 days |
| A — Admission | The party admits in court (pleadings, testimony, or otherwise) that a contract was made |
| P — Performance | Goods have been accepted and paid for or have been received and accepted — but only for the quantity actually performed |
Illini Security (a merchant) orally agrees to purchase $5,000 in surveillance cameras from Gies Co. (also a merchant). Gies Co. sends a written confirmation. If Illini Security does not object in writing within 10 days, the contract is enforceable under the merchant confirmation exception — even though Illini Security never signed anything.
Commercial Impracticability
A seller may be excused from performance if delivery has become commercially impracticable due to the occurrence of a contingency whose non-occurrence was a basic assumption of the contract. This is a narrow defense — mere increase in cost is generally not sufficient.
If a government embargo prevents Kingfisher Industries from obtaining raw materials needed to fulfill an order, Kingfisher Industries may be excused under the impracticability doctrine. However, if the price of raw materials simply doubles, Kingfisher Industries is generally not excused.
Failure of Agreed-Upon Transportation
If the agreed-upon method of delivery becomes unavailable or commercially impracticable, a commercially reasonable substitute must be tendered and accepted if available.
Delivery, Risk of Loss, and Title
Basic Delivery Duty
Unless the parties agree otherwise, the seller's basic obligation is to hold the goods at the seller's place of business (or residence, if no place of business) and make them available for the buyer to pick up. The seller must give the buyer reasonable notice that the goods are ready.
Identification of Goods
Identification occurs when specific goods are designated as the ones that will be used to fulfill the contract. Identification gives the buyer an insurable interest in the goods. Identification occurs:
- At the time of contracting if the goods already exist and are identified.
- When goods are shipped, marked, or otherwise designated by the seller.
- For future goods (crops, unborn animals), at the time designated in the contract or when the goods come into existence.
Party Designation and Delivery Terms
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Shipment contract (default) | Seller must deliver goods to the carrier and make a reasonable shipping contract |
| Destination contract | Seller must deliver goods to the buyer's specified destination |
| FOB Shipping Point | Shipment contract — risk passes to buyer when goods are delivered to carrier |
| FOB Destination | Destination contract — risk passes to buyer when goods arrive at destination |
| FAS (Free Alongside Ship) | Seller delivers goods alongside the vessel at the named port |
| CIF (Cost, Insurance, Freight) | Seller pays cost, insurance, and freight to the destination — but this is still a shipment contract |
Risk of Loss — Non-Carrier Cases
When no carrier is involved (e.g., buyer picks up goods):
| Seller Status | Risk of Loss Passes When... |
|---|---|
| Merchant seller | Buyer takes physical possession of the goods |
| Non-merchant seller | Seller tenders delivery (makes goods available) |
Bear Co. (a merchant) sells office furniture to a customer who will pick it up. Even after Bear Co. calls the customer and says the furniture is ready, the risk of loss stays with Bear Co. until the customer actually picks up the goods. If the furniture is destroyed by a fire overnight, Bear Co. bears the loss.
Risk of Loss — Carrier Cases
| Contract Type | Risk Passes When... |
|---|---|
| Shipment contract | Goods are delivered to the carrier |
| Destination contract | Goods are tendered at the destination |
Effect of Breach on Risk of Loss
A party who breaches the contract bears the risk of loss — even if the risk would otherwise have shifted.
- If the seller ships nonconforming goods, the seller retains the risk of loss until the buyer accepts the goods or the seller cures the nonconformity.
- If the buyer breaches (e.g., repudiates before goods are delivered), the buyer bears the risk of loss to the extent of any deficiency in the seller's insurance coverage, for a commercially reasonable time.
MAS Inc. ships nonconforming goods to BIF Partners. The goods are damaged in transit. Even though this is a shipment contract (risk normally passes at the carrier), MAS Inc. bears the risk because it breached by shipping nonconforming goods.
Sale on Approval vs. Sale or Return
| Feature | Sale on Approval | Sale or Return |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Buyer takes goods to try them out (consumer-oriented) | Buyer takes goods for resale |
| Title and risk | Remain with the seller until buyer approves | Pass to the buyer upon delivery |
| Creditors | Goods are not subject to buyer's creditors until acceptance | Goods are subject to buyer's creditors while in buyer's possession |
| Return | Buyer may return at seller's risk and expense | Buyer may return, but at buyer's risk and expense |
Title Passage
Title passes at the time and place the seller completes physical delivery:
- In a shipment contract, title passes when the seller delivers to the carrier.
- In a destination contract, title passes when the seller tenders at the destination.
- If delivery is made without moving the goods, title passes at the time and place of contracting (if goods are identified) or upon delivery of a document of title.
Warranties
Express Warranty
An express warranty is created when the seller makes an affirmation of fact or promise, provides a description of the goods, or shows a sample or model that becomes part of the basis of the bargain. The buyer does not need to show reliance — only that the representation was part of the basis of the bargain.
:::caution Key Rule
Express warranties cannot be disclaimed. Any attempt to disclaim an express warranty that conflicts with the warranty is inoperative. If Illini Entertainment's sales brochure states that a sound system "produces 500 watts of power," this is an express warranty that cannot be disclaimed by fine-print language saying "no warranties, express or implied."
::: Mere puffery (vague statements of opinion like "this is the best product on the market") does not create an express warranty.
Implied Warranty of Title
The implied warranty of title automatically arises in every sale of goods unless specifically disclaimed. Under this warranty:
- The seller guarantees they have good legal title to the goods.
- The goods are free from any undisclosed liens, claims, or encumbrances.
- The buyer will receive ownership free of any hidden legal claims they did not know about at the time of sale.
A seller who is a merchant also warrants against infringement — that the goods do not violate any third party's patent, trademark, or copyright.
This warranty protects the buyer from surprises like discovering the purchased goods are subject to a creditor's lien or another party's ownership claim. If Bear Co. buys equipment from Gies Co. and it turns out a bank has a perfected security interest in that equipment, Gies Co. has breached the warranty of title.
To disclaim the warranty of title, the seller must use specific language identifying that title is being disclaimed, or the circumstances must give the buyer reason to know that the seller does not claim full title (e.g., a sheriff's sale or foreclosure sale).
Implied Warranty of Merchantability
The implied warranty of merchantability arises automatically in every sale by a merchant seller (a seller who deals in goods of the kind). It guarantees that the goods are:
- Fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used
- Adequately contained, packaged, and labeled
- Conform to any promises or affirmations on the container or label
- Of fair average quality within the description
- Fungible goods are of fair average quality within the description
- Pass without objection in the trade under the contract description
If Kingfisher Industries, a manufacturer of industrial pumps, sells a pump that fails during normal use within weeks of delivery, the implied warranty of merchantability has been breached. The pump was not fit for the ordinary purpose of pumping.
Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose
This warranty arises when:
- The seller has reason to know the buyer's particular purpose.
- The seller has reason to know the buyer is relying on the seller's skill or judgment to select suitable goods.
- The buyer actually relies on the seller's expertise.
Unlike merchantability, this warranty can arise from any seller — not just merchants. The key distinction is that the buyer has a specific, non-ordinary use in mind.
:::note Example
Illini Security tells MAS Inc. (a chemical supplier) that it needs a cleaning solution strong enough to remove industrial adhesive residue from surveillance camera lenses without damaging the coatings. MAS Inc. recommends Product X. If Product X damages the lens coatings, MAS Inc. has breached the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose — even if Product X works perfectly for general cleaning.
:::
Disclaimer Rules
| Warranty | How to Disclaim |
|---|---|
| Express warranty | Cannot be disclaimed — any disclaimer that conflicts with an express warranty is inoperative |
| Warranty of title | Requires specific language or circumstances giving the buyer reason to know title is not guaranteed |
| Merchantability | Must mention the word "merchantability" — if in writing, must be conspicuous |
| Fitness for a particular purpose | Must be in writing and must be conspicuous (e.g., "THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES WHICH EXTEND BEYOND THE DESCRIPTION ON THE FACE HEREOF") |
| All implied warranties | Disclaimed by phrases like "as is" or "with all faults" |
A blanket "as is" disclaimer eliminates implied warranties of merchantability and fitness — but it does not disclaim express warranties or the warranty of title. Sellers cannot make promises and then take them away in the fine print.
Remedies
Anticipatory Repudiation
If either party clearly indicates — through words or conduct — that they will not perform their obligations before the performance is due, the aggrieved party may:
- Await performance for a commercially reasonable time.
- Resort to any remedy for breach, even before the performance date.
- Suspend their own performance.
The repudiating party may retract the repudiation before their next performance is due, as long as the aggrieved party has not canceled the contract, materially changed position, or otherwise indicated that the repudiation is final.
Right to Demand Adequate Assurances
When reasonable grounds for insecurity arise about the other party's ability or willingness to perform, the insecure party may:
- Demand in writing adequate assurance of due performance.
- Suspend performance until assurance is received (if commercially reasonable).
- Treat the contract as repudiated if assurance is not provided within a reasonable time (not exceeding 30 days).
BIF Partners contracts to buy $100,000 in inventory from Gies Co. BIF Partners then learns Gies Co. has defaulted on several supplier payments. BIF Partners may demand written assurances from Gies Co. that it will perform. If Gies Co. fails to respond within 30 days, BIF Partners may treat the contract as repudiated.
Seller's Remedies
When the buyer breaches or repudiates, the seller may:
| Remedy | Description |
|---|---|
| Cancel the contract | Terminate the contract and discharge all unperformed obligations |
| Withhold delivery | Refuse to deliver unshipped goods |
| Stop delivery in transit | If the buyer is insolvent, stop delivery of goods in the carrier's possession (for carload/truckload/planeload shipments, insolvency is required; for smaller shipments, any breach suffices) |
| Resell and recover damages | Resell the goods in a commercially reasonable manner and recover the difference between the contract price and the resale price, plus incidental damages |
| Recover full contract price | Available when (1) goods are accepted and buyer fails to pay, (2) goods are lost or damaged within a commercially reasonable time after risk passes to buyer, or (3) seller cannot resell at a reasonable price after reasonable effort |
| Recover damages for non-acceptance | Contract price minus market price (at time and place of tender), plus incidental damages, minus expenses saved |
Buyer's Remedies
When the seller breaches or repudiates, the buyer may:
| Remedy | Description |
|---|---|
| Reject nonconforming goods | Under the perfect tender rule, the buyer may reject the entire delivery, accept the entire delivery, or accept any commercial units and reject the rest — if goods fail to conform to the contract in any respect |
| Revoke acceptance | If a nonconformity substantially impairs the value of the goods and (1) the buyer accepted on the reasonable assumption that the nonconformity would be cured and it was not, or (2) the buyer did not discover the nonconformity and acceptance was reasonably induced by the seller's assurances or the difficulty of discovery |
| Cover | Buy substitute goods in good faith and without unreasonable delay, and recover the difference between the cover price and the contract price, plus incidental and consequential damages |
| Recover damages for non-delivery | Market price (at the time the buyer learned of the breach) minus contract price, plus incidental and consequential damages |
| Specific performance | Available when the goods are unique or in other proper circumstances (e.g., rare art, custom-manufactured equipment) |
| Replevin | Available when the buyer cannot cover after reasonable effort, or when goods have been identified to the contract and the buyer has paid part or all of the price |
| Recover damages for accepted goods | If the buyer has accepted nonconforming goods, the buyer may recover the loss resulting in the ordinary course of events from the seller's breach, as determined in any reasonable manner |
:::note Perfect Tender Rule
Under common law, substantial performance is sufficient. Under the UCC, the perfect tender rule applies: goods must conform to the contract in every respect, or the buyer can reject. However, the seller has a right to cure if the time for performance has not yet expired.
:::
Duty to Mitigate
Both parties have a general obligation to mitigate damages. A buyer cannot sit idle and accumulate damages when reasonable steps could reduce the loss. Similarly, a seller should make reasonable efforts to resell goods rather than letting them waste.
Liquidated Damages
The parties may agree in advance to liquidated damages in an amount that is reasonable in light of the anticipated or actual harm caused by the breach. Unreasonably large liquidated damages clauses are void as penalties.
No Punitive Damages
The UCC does not provide for punitive damages. Remedies are designed to put the aggrieved party in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed — compensatory only.
Entrusting
Entrusting occurs when an owner delivers goods to a merchant who deals in goods of that kind. Under UCC § 2-403(2), a merchant who receives entrusted goods has the power to transfer all rights of the entruster to a buyer in the ordinary course of business.
:::warning Key Rule
If Illini Entertainment delivers a vintage guitar to a music store (a merchant that deals in guitars) for repair, and the music store mistakenly sells the guitar to a customer who buys in good faith, the customer obtains good title to the guitar. Illini Entertainment's remedy is against the music store — not the innocent buyer. This rule protects good-faith purchasers who buy from merchants in the ordinary course of business.
::: The entrusting rule applies regardless of whether the merchant was authorized to sell the goods. The policy rationale is that buyers in the ordinary course should be able to trust that a merchant has the right to sell goods displayed in their store.
| Element | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Entruster | Owner who delivers goods to a merchant |
| Merchant | Deals in goods of the kind |
| Buyer in ordinary course | Buys in good faith, without knowledge that the sale violates the entruster's rights, from a merchant's inventory |
| Effect | Buyer gets all rights the entruster had — even though the merchant had no authority to sell |
:::tip Exam Application
Entrusting questions test whether the buyer qualifies as a buyer in the ordinary course of business. If the buyer knows the merchant has no right to sell the goods, the buyer does not qualify. Similarly, if the goods are not part of the merchant's ordinary inventory (e.g., a pawn shop selling a TV left for repair), the rule may not apply.
:::